Tomas Martin Etcheverry vs Damir Dzumhur Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 18 Sep at 07:19 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
T. Martin Etcheverry vs D. Dzumhur

ARG
1
Win
Played
0
Win

BIH
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Etcheverry 1 - 0 Dzumhur
They have played 2 sets in total, with Tomas Martin Etcheverry winning 2 and Damir Dzumhur winning 0. The last match between Tomas Martin Etcheverry and Damir Dzumhur was at the Hangzhou Open - Hangzhou, 18-09-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Tomas Martin Etcheverry getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Etcheverry | 1 |
| Dzumhur | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) Hangzhou Open - Hangzhou(09-18-25)
T. M. Etcheverry vs D. Dzumhur H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $3,318,560 | Career Prize Money | $3,048,208 |
| 61.21% (374-237) | Career Total W/L | 58.11% (598-431) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 8 | Titles | 29 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 45.45% (25-30) | YTD Win/Loss | 43.75% (21-27) |
T. M. Etcheverry vs D. Dzumhur Match Preview:
- Dzumhur has a slight edge in second serve performance, winning 47.9% of points, just outperforming Etcheverry at 46.53%. Could this small advantage play a pivotal role?
- When facing their opponents' second serves, both players have nearly identical return statistics, with Dzumhur at 45.31% and Etcheverry at 45.34%.
- Dzumhur shows a stronger ability to break opponents' first serves at 30.14%, compared to Etcheverry's 25.1%. Could first serve returns decide the match?
- Under pressure, Etcheverry saves more breakpoints (60.65%) compared to Dzumhur's 52.98%, providing him with resilience in tight situations.
- In terms of match wins over the past year, Dzumhur leads with 52%, whereas Etcheverry has won 42.37% of his matches.
- Both players perform best on clay, but Etcheverry has a slightly better win rate of 65%, compared to Dzumhur's 63% on this surface.
- On grass, Dzumhur's performance exceeds Etcheverry's with a 44% win rate compared to Etcheverry's 29%.
- While Dzumhur has faced lower-ranked opponents with an average rank of 160.45, Etcheverry has competed against stronger players, averaging an opponent rank of 77.66.
- In deciding sets, Dzumhur has a significant advantage, winning 60% compared to Etcheverry's 42%.
- Dzumhur's breakpoint conversion stands at 33.99%, more effective than Etcheverry's 25.42%, which could be crucial in critical game moments.
Editorial Prediction (September 18, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing the current performance statistics, Dzumhur demonstrates a slight edge overall, especially in key areas such as breakpoint conversion and deciding set performance. These facets might dictate the outcome in closely contested sets.
Despite Etcheverry's ability to save more breakpoints under pressure and his experience against higher-ranked competition, Dzumhur's better statistics on important metrics give him a potential advantage. His slightly more effective second serve and return game could set the foundation for winning critical points.
Considering these factors, Dzumhur is marginally favored to win this upcoming match, as his game seems well-rounded and capable of handling pressure situations more effectively. However, both players bring unique strengths to the court, promising an exciting match-up.
Tomas Martin Etcheverry vs Damir Dzumhur Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
T. M. Etcheverry vs D. Dzumhur H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 8 | Aces (Total) | 6 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:15:55 | Average Match Time | 1:15:55 |
| 76% (35/46) | 1st Serve % | 60% (31/52) |
| 77% (27/35) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (19/31) |
| 64% (7/11) | 2nd Serve Win % | 38% (8/21) |
| 50% (4/8) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (1/2) |
| 48% (25/52) | Return Points Win % | 26% (12/46) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
T. M. Etcheverry Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 6-7(2) 7-6(4) 7-6(3) | ||
R1 | W | 6-7(5) 7-6(3) 6-3 | ||
R1 | L | 7-5 6-3 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-2 6-3 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-2 6-4 | ||
D. Dzumhur Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 4-6 6-3 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 6-2 | ||
R1 | L | 6-3 6-3 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-7(2) 6-3 7-6(7) | ||
Q1 | W | 4-6 6-3 6-1 | ||

T. M. Etcheverry vs D. Dzumhur Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61.21% (374/237) | YTD Win/Loss | 58.16% (599/431) |
| 58.65% (861/607) | Sets Win/Loss | 55.91% (1395/1100) |
| 53.68% (7516/6485) | Games Win/Loss | 52.23% (12170/11131) |
| 49.49% (49/50) | Hard Win/Loss | 52.55% (134/121) |
| 65.01% (301/162) | Clay Win/Loss | 62.91% (324/191) |
| 59.38% (19/13) | Indoor Hard W/L | 55.80% (125/99) |
| 29.41% (5/12) | Grass Win/Loss | 44.44% (16/20) |
| 0.38 | Aces Per Game | 0.14 |
| 2571 | Aces Total | 1627 |
| 0.13 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 905 | Total Double Faults | 2011 |
| 1:53:54 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 361.62 | Average Opponent Rank | 489.45 |
| 67% (27656/41153) | 1st Serve % | 65% (39835/61058) |
| 69% (19217/27656) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (25874/39835) |
| 51% (6915/13497) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (10783/21217) |
| 42% (1785/4287) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (2893/6614) |
| 40% (16979/42377) | Return Points Win % | 41% (25563/61778) |
| 52.50% (21/19) | Slam W/L | 42.53% (37/50) |
| 41.46% (17/24) | Masters W/L | 42.68% (35/47) |
| 71.43% (5/2) | Cups W/L | 60.98% (25/16) |
| 50.00% (65/65) | Main Tour W/L | 52.14% (146/134) |
| 66.84% (129/64) | Challenger W/L | 62.37% (242/146) |
| 68.69% (136/62) | Futures W/L | 75.33% (113/37) |
| 62% (352/568) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (553/938) |
| 50% (18/36) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 47% (36/77) |
| 50% (106/212) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (148/292) |
| 54% (109/202) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (184/340) |
| 83% (375/311) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (561/482) |
| 16% (375/61) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (561/79) |
| 25% (235/59) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (466/112) |